- Bottle = Buy It
- Bar = Try It
- Bust = Leave It
Whiskey reviews and advice by Jeff Schwartz a/k/a The Whiskeyfellow. Learn, laugh and enjoy great whiskey!
My
history with Teeling Whiskey goes back almost seven years. I was the Whiskey
Consultant for Vom Fass’s flagship store in Madison, Wisconsin, and
there were several independent bottlings of Teeling whiskeys available. One of
them, called Against the Grain, was my secret weapon whenever someone
came into the store and suggested they didn’t care for whiskey at all. I’d pour
them a sample, and it was a game-changer more often than not.
Since
moving on from Vom Fass, I’ve not had much opportunity to try Teeling’s whiskeys.
I’ve seen them on the shelves, but I’d always explore something else. I came
across a triple pack of 50ml Teeling’s Single Malt, Single Grain, and Small
Batch whiskeys one day, and it would be my opportunity to try all three.
If
you’re not familiar with the Teeling family, you should be. Go back a few
generations to Walter Teeling, who started the journey back in 1792 in
Dublin. There is a suggestion that the Teelings have been involved ever since. In 1987, John Teeling
purchased a formerly-state run industrial alcohol facility, installed a couple
of stills, and then became the Cooley Distillery. Cooley wasn’t any distillery; it was winning
accolades for what it produced. It became so much so that in 2011, Beam
Suntory bought it.
And
that may have been the end of Teeling, except it wasn’t. John’s sons, Stephen
and Jack, teamed with their first employee, Alex Chasko (its
Master Distiller and Blender), and opened the Teeling Whiskey Distillery
in 2015, the first new distillery in Dublin in 125 years. Because of that,
combined with laws governing Irish whiskey, anything with the Teeling label before
2018 is sourced (from Cooley, Old Bushmills, etc.).
Today’s
review is of its Single Grain release. While we’re in 2022, the Trinity Pack I
purchased was from 2019. I believe this whiskey is still a Cooley product and the
labels state it is crafted and bottled
by Teeling (rather than distilled).
The
Single Grain starts with a mash of 95% corn and 5% malted barley. If that has
you scratching your head, recall that single
refers to the distillery, not the actual grain content. Single malt or single
grain whiskey comes from a single distillery, whereas a blend is from several. It
carries no age statement, but it is aged between five and six years. It spent
time in former Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon French Oak casks. Packaged at 46%
ABV (92°), you can expect to spend $45.00 or so on a 750ml bottle.
How
does the Single Grain fare? The only way to answer that is to #DrinkCurious.
Appearance: Poured neat into my Glencairn glass, this
single grain whiskey presented as deep orange. It formed a medium-weighted rim
that released wide, slow legs that fell back to the pool.
Nose: Before
I even picked up the glass, a waft of butterscotch was easy to find. Once I brought
it close to my face, I found plum jam, vanilla, French oak, and sawdust. The
last note was curious because, in my experience, it suggests smaller cooperage,
which isn’t the case here. As I drew that air past my lips, oak and toasted
pineapple rolled across my tongue.
Palate: The first sip seemed thin, but that texture
thickened quickly, making it full-bodied and creamy. Coconut and Werther’s candy
came out in a big way on the front. Next, I tasted date, pear, and cranberry. The back featured oak, caramel, and toffee.
Finish: The French oak woke up on the finish and kept
building. At its crescendo, cinnamon spice and toffee toned it. The
finish was long and very dry, almost giving me the pucker power that one should expect from Cabernet Sauvignon casks.
Bottle, Bar, or Bust: I went
into this review wanting to like the Teeling Single Grain. The independent
bottlings of its Single Grain from the Cooley Distillery were lovely.
Unfortunately, that wasn’t my experience with their branded one. I’m not
suggesting this is bad because it isn’t. It just lacks anything remarkable to
give a wow factor. I do appreciate
its 46% ABV versus the 40% that so many Irish whiskeys have, but that in and
upon itself doesn’t push it over the edge. For the price, I would recommend
trying this one at a Bar before
committing to the entire bottle. Cheers!
My Simple, Easy to
Understand Rating System
Whiskeyfellow encourages
you to enjoy your whiskey as you see fit but begs you do so responsibly.
Recently,
friends of mine took a vacation to Tennessee and surprised me with some bottles
from the Jack Daniel’s Distillery. These weren’t ordinary bottles that
you could just get anywhere. They’re an experimental series called Tennessee
Tasters. At the time I’m writing this, there are seven whiskeys in the
series.
If
you’re unfamiliar with Jack Daniel’s (is there anyone who hasn’t heard of it?),
it was founded in 1866 as the first registered distillery in the United States.
It started when Jasper “Jack” Newton Daniel purchased a distillery for
$25.00 from a preacher named Dan Call. One of Call’s slaves named Nearis
Green (also known as Nathan “Nearest” Green) taught Jack how to
distill whiskey.
Daniel
used water from Cave Spring Hollow in Lynchburg. Realizing how vital it was to
have a steady, reliable water source, he purchased it and the surrounding land.
The rest, of course, is history, and Jack Daniel’s is the #1 selling whiskey in
the United States and the fourth most popular in the world.
My
friends brought me three bottles of the Tennessee Tasters. Another friend, David
Levine, sent me samples of the remaining four so I could have a complete
set and provide tasting notes for each.
Each
whiskey has a different recipe and proof, but each 375ml bottle will set you
back $39.99, and there are about 24,000 bottles of each available. With that
being said, I’ll #DrinkCurious and tell you about each one. My usual
format will be slightly different; I’ll give the specifications of each and then
provide the tasting notes. Unless otherwise stated, each Taster is distilled
from the Old No. 7 mashbill.
Release 001 – High Angel’s Share Barrels
Appearance: In my Glencairn glass, this whiskey was the
color of caramel. It formed a thick rim with fast, heavy legs.
Nose: Cinnamon,
lemon zest, and oak joined with caramel and vanilla. When I pulled the aroma
into my mouth, there was more caramel.
Palate: I found the mouthfeel to be oily and thick. I
tasted English toffee, caramel, and raw honey on the front of my palate. The
middle featured crème brûlée,
and the back offered berries, cinnamon, and oak.
Finish: Medium to long in duration, the finish was
made of berries, English toffee, and oak.
Bottle, Bar, or Bust: I enjoyed this pour. It was perfectly proofed
and full of flavor. It is difficult not to sip this one and smile. I’m happy to
crown this one with a Bottle rating.
◊◊◊◊◊
Release 002 – Hickory Smoke
Appearance: Chestnut in color, Release 002 formed a thin
rim on the wall of my Glencairn glass and yielded thick, quick legs.
Nose: As you might suspect, hickory smoke was
dominating. Beneath it was vanilla and caramel. As I drew the air past my lips,
vanilla rolled across my tongue.
Palate: Thin and oily, the front of my palate
experienced hickory smoke and oak. The middle consisted of vanilla and cream,
while the back tasted of dark chocolate and berries.
Finish: Perhaps the most interesting of this whiskey
was the Blue Diamond Smoked Almonds, salt, and roasted coffee flavors that
remained for a medium-to-long finish.
Bottle, Bar, or Bust: Each tasting element should be exciting. In
the base of Release 002, the only riveting component was the finish. That’s not
to say this was a lousy whiskey; instead, just a few notes mostly seemed out of
place. A Bar rating is
well-deserved.
◊◊◊◊◊
Appearance: The
orange-amber liquid issued a thin rim and weak legs in my Glencairn glass.
Nose: I
smelled fruity notes of strawberry and plum, then sweet vanilla, and finally,
oak. In my mouth, the vapor tasted of bananas.
Palate: A silky texture greeted my tongue. Banana,
plum, and cherry flavors completed the front, while vanilla encompassed the
entire middle. Toasted oak and leather created the back.
Finish: Medium in length, the finish was cherry,
vanilla, and oak.
Bottle, Bar, or Bust: I appreciate what Jack Daniel’s tried to do
with Release 003. It is unique; it is also only a few notes, and this whiskey
could have been so much more. My recommendation would be to try it at a Bar first.
◊◊◊◊◊
Release 004 – Barrel Proof
Rye
Appearance: This whiskey presented as caramel in color and
formed an ultra-thin rim on the wall of my Glencairn glass. What remained were
sticky droplets that fought gravity.
Nose: Aromas
of cherry and prune married brown sugar and caramel. Charred oak was also easy
to discern. Through my mouth, banana teased my palate.
Palate: So far, Release 004 has the oiliest texture.
Banana bread, rye spice, and cinnamon made for an exciting start. The middle
featured caramel, nutmeg, and anise. On the back, I tasted leather, allspice,
and coffee.
Finish: Long and lingering, this Rye had a spicy
finish made of coffee, allspice, rye bread, and charred oak.
Bottle, Bar, or Bust: There was nothing not to enjoy with this Rye.
Flavors meshed naturally. I loved how this went from sweet to spicy. Release
004 also drank under its stated proof. A Bottle
rating for sure!
◊◊◊◊◊
Release 005 – Barrel Reunion #2
Appearance: Poured neat in my Glencairn glass, the caramel
color was enticing. A medium rim was formed, which released watery legs.
Nose: Peanut butter!
I’m a peanut butter freak, and peanut butter just exploded out of the
glass. While I couldn’t care less what other aromas were floating around, they
were there and featured vanilla, toasted oak, and cherry pie filling. Drawing
the vapor into my mouth, vanilla was evident.
Palate: A creamy, full-bodied mouthfeel resulted in
milk chocolate and oatmeal cookies on the front. Peanut butter and nougat
formed the middle, while coffee, dark chocolate, and cherry summed up the back.
Finish: Medium in duration, the finish was made of
chocolate-covered peanuts, coffee, nougat, and cherry.
Bottle, Bar, or Bust: Release 005 was mind-blowing and easily a
standout from anything else in the series. I would have loved a longer finish. As
my favorite of the seven, this snags a Bottle
rating.
◊◊◊◊◊
Release 006 – Jamaican Allspice
Appearance: A reddish-amber hue grabbed my attention. In
my Glencairn glass, it generated a medium rim with irregular, thick legs.
Nose: As you’d imagine, a mesquite aroma blasted my
face. Accompanied by honey barbeque, brown sugar, plum, and tobacco, the
sweetness melded nicely with the liquid smoke. As I drew the air into my mouth,
vanilla punched my tongue.
Palate: Medium-bodied, caramel and cola were at the
front of my palate. Flavors of honey and coffee formed the middle, while
allspice, smoked oak, and tobacco were on the back.
Finish: Medium in duration, the finish tasted of
clove, tobacco leaf, smoked oak, and cola.
Bottle, Bar, or Bust: Release 006 was an easy sipper. I have had pimento wood/allspice finished whiskeys before, and usually, what dominates is the allspice. I believe the cola notes tamed it. There weren’t complicated notes, yet overall, it was delicious. I’m happy to convey my Bottle rating.
◊◊◊◊◊
Batch 007 – 14E19 “Twin”
Blend Whiskey
Appearance: Caramel
in color, it formed a medium rim on the side of my Glencairn glass, then
released thick, fast legs.
Nose: An aroma of honey barbeque sauce blended with cinnamon
and brown sugar. When I inhaled through my lips, vanilla and rye spice were
noted.
Palate: I found the mouthfeel to be thin and oily. At
the front, I discerned caramel, vanilla, and citrus. The middle featured
molasses and honey, while the back was cinnamon, more caramel, and barrel char.
Finish: Long and spicy, the finish tasted of rye,
charred oak, nutmeg, and caramel.
Bottle, Bar, or Bust: Release 007 was the least interesting of the series.
I enjoy bouryes; this was just Plain Jane and didn’t do anything for me. I must
stress it wasn’t bad. But, it does take a Bar rating.
Final
Thoughts: If Jack Daniel’s releases
additional experimental whiskeys to the Tennessee Tasters series, I’ll review
them separately. Thanks for wading through all of these notes. Cheers!
My Simple, Easy to
Understand Rating System
Whiskeyfellow encourages
you to enjoy your whiskey as you see fit but begs you do so responsibly.
![]() |
Photo courtesy of Highland Park |
A
handful of annual-release whiskeys out there have me longing to see what the
next one brings. I don’t mean the standard-bearers out there that’s pretty much
the same whiskey year after year, just offered at varying proofs. Instead, I’m
talking about the ones you never know what to expect because something
different is done each time.
One
such whiskey is Blood Oath Kentucky Straight Bourbon. Lux Row Distillers
produces the whiskey under the creative mind of master distiller John Rempe.
Each release is called a Pact. The
2022 incarnation is Pact 8. I’ve reviewed most of the Pacts, and no two
are even close to alike.
“I’ve once again sourced three great Bourbons for Blood Oath Pact 8, and I’m particularly excited to include a Bourbon finished in Calvados casks. The Calvados cask will bring additional tasting notes characterized by slight apple on the nose, with hints of vanilla and cinnamon, as well as flavor notes of ripe apples, juicy pears, butterscotch, and even subtle hints of chocolate. Blood Oath Pact 8 is a Bourbon I’m proud to share with Bourbon lovers, but the recipe is a secret I’ll be keeping to myself.” – John Rempe
If
you’re unfamiliar with Calvados, that’s a brandy made from apples or pears from
France’s Normandy region. The fruits are made into a cider, then distilled and
aged for at least two years in oak.
While
it carries no age statement, Rempe does disclose its components are 14-year,
11-year, and 8-year rye Bourbons. The latter is the one finished in Calvados
casks. After blending, the concoction is bottled at 98.6°. Every Pact is
packaged at that particular proof – that’s the temperature of human blood!
There
are a total of 51,000 bottles available. In the seven-year history of Blood
Oath, each 750ml package was $99.99. Like everything else in 2022, inflation
reared its ugly head, and Pact 8 will set you back $119.99. That’s a 20% increase; however, Pacts 5, 6,
and 7 could easily have been valued above their stated MSRPs, and no one would
complain.
We’re
left with two questions: Is Pact 8 any good?; and, Is Pact 8 worth the premium? The only
way to answer either is to #DrinkCurious. But, before I do, I must thank
Lux Row Distillers for providing me a sample in exchange for a
no-strings-attached, honest review.
Appearance: Poured neat in my Glencairn glass, this
Bourbon was a brilliant copper. A thinner rim offered wide tears that crawled
back to the pool.
Nose: Apple
and pear presented as promised. Milk chocolate, like a Hershey bar, came next.
Nutmeg, vanilla, and toasted oak followed. As I drew the air into my mouth,
cinnamon apple rolled across my tongue.
Palate: Blood Oath greeted me with a cool, buttery
texture. I’ve had Calvados before, and everything I’ve ever tasted was in the
mix. The front featured dry pear, bittersweet apple, and green apple. Vanilla
and a massive punch of very dark chocolate formed the middle. The back was a
spice bomb with dry oak, clove, and cinnamon Red Hots.
Finish: Dry, French oak, cinnamon apple, and likely
the most prominent clove note I’ve had made for a long-lasting, warm finish.
Blood Oath Pact 8 doesn’t drink hotter than its stated proof, but the spice could
trick you into believing otherwise. When I thought all was said and done, the
bittersweet apple came for an encore.
With
Water: Pact 8 made me curious about
what two drops of distilled water would do. The apple and pear on the nose became
sweeter. Cinnamon remained, but the chocolate notes vanished. The apple went
from bittersweet to bitter on the palate, with oak and clove spice. The Red
Hots were gone, as was the dark chocolate. The French oak became more prominent
on the finish, but the apple and pear sweetened. I wouldn't recommend dropping
the proof. Things were not complex; they were confusing.
Bottle, Bar, or Bust: If you’re into sweeter Bourbons, then Blood
Oath Pact 8 is one you should frankly avoid because you’re not going to find
anything here that caters to your palate. However, if you appreciate spicy,
high-rye Bourbons, Pact 8 may be your Holy Grail. Thankfully, I am happy with
either direction. A bonus is that you’ll nurse this year’s release, making that
$119.99 investment last longer than usual. In the 2022 Bourbon world, I am not
turned off by the higher price. At $99.99, it would have been an absolute
steal. At MSRP, I believe you’ll walk away happy, and for that, Pact 8 snags my
Bottle rating. Cheers!
My Simple, Easy to
Understand Rating System
Whiskeyfellow encourages
you to enjoy your whiskey as you see fit but begs you do so responsibly.
Pendleton “Original” is a whisky bottled by Hood River Distillers
in Oregon. It uses glacial water from the Mt. Hood National Forest. It is named
to “celebrate the spirit of the American cowboy and cowgirl.” However, it is a
Canadian blended whisky distilled from the “finest ingredients” and aged in
American oak. It carries no age statement.
Pendleton
isn’t overly difficult to find, and it certainly is affordable. A 750ml, 40%
ABV (80°) package runs about $22.00.
In
full disclosure, I’m unimpressed with the mainstream Canadian whiskies I’ve
tried so far—all of them. But, I keep trying others as I stumble across them in
hopes of finding something that is beyond a mediocre mixer. I also work to
clear my mind as best as possible and approach each one as I do with any other
whisky – no expectations. That’s the #DrinkCurious lifestyle.
Let’s
get to this review, shall we?
Appearance: Poured
neat in my Glencairn glass, I allowed this to breathe for about 20 minutes. It
presented as dull gold and made a fragile rim that led to weak legs.
Nose: As I
brought the glass to my face, the aroma reminded me of Corn Chex cereal. Also
found was a hint of cinnamon before what smelled like industrial floor cleaner
took away the others. When I took the air into my mouth, it was like acetone.
Palate: There
are many instances where a lovely palate offsets a poor nosing experience. The
mouthfeel was thick and creamy. I picked up caramel and then what tasted
exactly like vanilla-flavored vodka. It wasn’t my favorite, but it wasn’t
offensive like the nose.
Finish: Have you ever been dusting your furniture and
accidentally taking a cloud of lemon Pledge in your mouth? That’s what I think
I was tasting. Chemical qualities remained, which I initially thought was clove,
but any semblance of it quickly vaporized. And unfortunately, it stuck around.
Bottle, Bar, or Bust: Must I say it? Bust. End of story.
My Simple, Easy to
Understand Rating System
Whiskeyfellow encourages
you to enjoy your whiskey as you see fit but begs you do so responsibly.
It
isn’t often that I get to sip older Scotch whiskies. When I do, it is usually due
to the generosity of friends who, like all good whisky ambassadors, believe
that whisky is meant for sharing, and they make that happen.
Once
a year, The GlenDronach rolls out a batch of its Scotches referred to as
The Cask Bottlings. These aren’t your average Highland whiskies; instead,
these tend to fall into the ancient category.
They’re all single malts, naturally colored and non-chill filtered, and the
distillery is renowned for its use of high-quality Spanish sherry casks in the
aging process. The 2022 release is referred to as Batch 19.
“The GlenDronach Cask Bottling Batch 19 offers an insight into our sherry cask maturation history and the exceptional quality of the casks we have at The GlenDronach. I have personally chosen these casks to celebrate and share the very best of the distillery’s character. Each represents the rich selection of barrels, Hogsheads, Puncheons and Butts that have been used throughout The GlenDronach’s history. This release reflects our enduring commitment to crafting the most exceptional, richly sherried Single Malts representative of The GlenDronach’s rare dedication to its craft, embodied in every expression.” – Dr. Rachel Barrie, Master Blender
Batch
19 consists of three different casks:
Cask 5080 (1994), Cask 6052 (1992), and Cask 217 (1992).
I
want to thank The GlenDronach for providing me samples of the three in exchange
for no-strings-attached, honest reviews. Now, it is time to #DrinkCurious.
First
up is Cask 5080. Aged 27 years, this single malt Scotch rested in a
former Oloroso sherry puncheon. It yielded 667 bottles packaged at 54.3% ABV
(108.6°). While you’ll find this on some store shelves in AZ, CO, DE, DC, IL, FL, MD, MN, MD, NV, and SC, you should expect to spend at least $600.00.
Appearance: Poured
neat in my Glencairn glass, Cask 5080 looked like burnt umber. A medium-thick
rim formed long, wide legs.
Nose: A
fruity aroma of fig, raisin, date, cranberry, and vanilla
cream started the journey. It was joined by toasted walnut, and when I drew the
vapor into my mouth, a wave of cherry vanilla caressed my tongue.
Palate: The
silky texture featured fig, black cherry, and caramel on the front of my
palate, while sweet pipe tobacco, orange zest, and cherry cola were on the
middle. The back offered old oak, clove, and dark chocolate.
Finish: Pipe tobacco, dark chocolate, fig, clove, and
dry oak remained for a long, lingering finish.
Bottle, Bar, or Bust: Cask 5080 is, in a word, stunning. The nose was enticing, the mouthfeel rich, and the
combination of flavors complimented one another as if they were designed to do
so. I can’t help but give it a Bottle
rating.
Adding
another year, the next Scotch is Cask 6052. I’m assuming it aged a few
months shy of 28 years in a former Pedro
Ximénez sherry puncheon. There are 658 bottles available at
50.8% ABV (101.6°), and the suggested retail is $720.00. Availability is limited to CA, ID, IN, KY, LA, NM, NC, ND, NE, MT, OH, OK, OR, TX, UT, WA, and WY.
Appearance: A deep,
caramel color filled my Glencairn glass. It took an effort to create an
ultra-thin rim. It generated sticky legs that crawled back to the pool of
whisky.
Nose: I found
cherry, plum, fig, strawberry, and red grape entwined with dark chocolate and
oak. English toffee rolled across my tongue when I inhaled through my lips.
Palate: A
medium-weight, silky mouthfeel released flavors of sweet vanilla, orange, and
apricot on the front of my palate. Espresso and tobacco leaf fell on the
middle, while dark chocolate, oak, and a kiss of caramel were on the back.
Finish: French
oak, dark chocolate, and espresso remained for a long, steady finish.
Bottle, Bar, or Bust: While the nose was fruity, the palate was far
less so. The spice notes dominated. I frankly didn’t expect that from a PX cask
– the sweeter notes were anticipated. I don’t mean to imply that I didn’t enjoy
Cask 6052; I was merely caught off-guard. Age allowed the spiciness to be mellow,
keeping it from becoming a punch. I can see this whisky being particularly
attractive to fans of mature American rye whiskeys (and I fall into that
category). A Bottle rating is
warranted.
The
final whisky is the oldest: Cask 217. It spent a whopping 29 years in an
Oloroso sherry butt. Only 383 bottles were filled, and as you can imagine, its
distribution is much smaller. GA, MA, NY, and NJ were the handful that can sell it for the suggested
$820.00 price. You’re getting 55.4% ABV (110.8°) for that investment.
Appearance: Served
neat in my Glencairn glass, Cask 217 looked like maple syrup. Not the artificial
stuff you buy at the grocery store, but real syrup from places like Vermont.
The thick rim made husky legs.
Nose: A bouquet of plum, raisin, leather, and fudge
tickled my olfactory sense. Plum plowed through as I pulled the air into my
mouth.
Palate: Whereas
the previous two whiskies had silky textures, Cask 217 was oily. The
uncomplicated palate started with dark chocolate and nutmeg on the front. The
middle featured rum raisin and black cherry. The back was an interesting blend
of leather, oak, and fresh ginger.
Finish: Remember the fudge from the nose? That came
out from nowhere like an angry bull let loose for San Fermin. There were oak
tannins, nutmeg, old leather, and cherry mixed with that fudge.
Bottle, Bar, or Bust: I appreciate how simple the palate of this
Scotch was. That finish was mind-blowing. I happily convey a Bottle rating for the finish alone.
Final
Thoughts: For the
three whiskies of Batch 19, my recommendations purposefully ignored price. Why?
Because I don’t purchase whiskies in this price range. That doesn’t mean you
(or someone you know) don’t. Experiencing something the caliber of Batch 19 is
a rare opportunity, and the only thing I took into account were the aromas,
flavors, and finish.
Of the three, my favorite pour was Cask 5080, which happened to be the youngest. The second was the elderly Cask 217, and the third was, of course, Cask 6052. Cheers!
My Simple, Easy to
Understand Rating System
Whiskeyfellow encourages
you to enjoy your whiskey as you see fit but begs you do so responsibly.